FIUV Position Papers on the 1962 Missal

FIUV launches discussion papers on the 1962 Missal The Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce (FIUV) is launching a series of short 'position papers' on aspects of the 1962 Missal, with a view to stimulating debate on aspects of the 'Extraordinary Form' which have been criticised in the past, and might be subject to change in the future.
We have a two-fold goal. First, to contribute to a debate, which has been on-going since at least the mid 20th Century, about the theological appropriateness and pastoral effectiveness of (what is now, in the Holy Father's phrase) 'the former liturgical tradition'. We wish to equip those attached to this tradition with the best possible arguments, backed by the best authorities, for maintaining the organic integrity of this tradition, expressed as succinctly as possible but, we hope, comprehensible to a wide audience. We hope in this way to raise the standard of debate which takes place no longer only in the seminar room, but wherever Catholics meet, particularly on the internet.
Secondly, we do this in light of the Holy Father's letter to Bishops accompanying the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum:
  • For that matter, the two Forms of the usage of the Roman Rite can be mutually enriching: new Saints and some of the new Prefaces can and should be inserted in the old Missal. The "Ecclesia Dei" Commission, in contact with various bodies devoted to the usus antiquior, will study the practical possibilities in this regard.
The FIUV is not merely one among many 'bodies devoted to the EF', but is the only international body able to speak for the laity attached to this form of the liturgy. We were established in 1965, at the very beginning of the 'Traditional Movement', and represent a large and growing number of lay associations in North and South America, Europe, Africa and Asia. We have been representing the views and needs of our member associations in Rome, and to the wider world, for nearly half a century.
Accordingly, we have set up a 'Liturgy and Spirituality Subcommittee' to coordinate the development and publication of these position papers. I (Joseph Shaw, coincidentally Chairman of the Latin Mass Society) am the Moderator of that Subcommittee, and in that capacity I am presenting these papers to the public, on Rorate Caeli, thanks to New Catholic's great hospitality. While the Holy Father makes reference to two areas of possible change to the 1962 books, new Saints and Prefaces, debate about the future of these liturgical books is not limited to those matters. For that reason, and also because of the first mentioned purpose of these papers, we will be addressing topics on a wide range of issues. As well as an introductory paper, giving something of a disclaimer about our remit, the topics planned are:

Introduction (revised 19/3/12) - Deutsch 
PP 1: The Service of Men and Boys at the Altar (updated 03/6/14)- Deutsch 
PP 2: Liturgical Piety and Participation (revised 19/3/12) - Deutsch 
PP 3: The Manner of Receiving Communion - Deutsch 
PP 4: Liturgical Orientation 
PP 5: The Vulgate and Gallican Psalter 
PP 6: Liturgical Pluralism 
PP 7: Latin as Liturgical Language (revised 10/10/12) 
PP 8: Prefaces
PP 9: Silence (revised 10/10/12) 
PP 10: Eucharistic Fast 
PP 11: Western Culture 
PP 12: Latin in Seminaries 
PP 13: Holy Days of Obligation (revised 10/1/14) 
PP 14: Holy Week Reform of 1955, Part I - General Comments 
PP 14: Holy Week Reform of 1955, Part II - Liturgies 
PP 15: The Lectionary of the Extraordinary Form 
PP 16: The Proclamation of Lections in Latin in the Extraordinary Form 
PP 17: The Reception of Communion under the Species of Bread Alone in the Extraordinary Form 
PP 18: The Missa Lecta 
PP 19: The Kiss of Peace
PP 20: The Season of Septuagesima, and Vigils and Octaves, in the Extraordinary Form
PP 21: The Extraordinary Form and the Eastern Churches
PP 22: Headcoverings in Church in the Extraordinary Form
PP 23: The Extraordinary Form and China
PP 24: Prayers for the Persecuted Church and the Leonine Prayers (revised 03/1/15)
PP 25: The Extraordinary Form and Sub-Saharan Africa
PP 26: The Extraordinary Form and Men
PP 27: Tradition, Reform, and Restoration
PP 28: The Good Friday Prayer for the Jews in the Extraordinary Form

The first 13 papers, and the introduction, have been compiled into a Lulu book. A revised version of the book, containing the latest Position Papers, is currently under development. We expect it to be available later in November.

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu. 


His Excellency Archbishop Thomas Gullickson, Apostolic Nuncio to the Ukraine has kindly written an endorsement of the book
I think I would have enjoyed writing additional reviews [on the blog] and could have weighed in much more heavily on behalf of a project which has enjoyed my favour since I first became acquainted with it, namely The FIUV Papers on the Liturgy, which discuss specific issues concerning the 1962 Missal. The Papers have become one of the pillars of the internet presence of the Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce.
The genius of the 13 papers, to my mind, is that they do indeed teach and quite comprehensively, offering important lessons about why we need to focus more or better on the very real issue of what to do about the rupture in the continuity of our liturgical tradition which has come to be and not through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. As important as it may be to get about the business of repairing, I find the work done by these papers to be of a prior importance to any decision about "reforming the reform" or "rebooting" after choosing a restoration point and establishing principles for the organic development of a restored Roman Rite. The FIUV Papers on the Liturgy really grapple with what the Holy Father calls the mutual enrichment of the two forms of the Roman Rite.
Without wanting to be a reductionist about assessing their worth, let me say simply that reading and ruminating over the FIUV Papers on the Liturgy could serve as a marvellous primer for anyone, clergy or laity, on how to address what often ends up being controversial, doing so in a very different and respectful manner.
[See also Archbishop Gullickson’s blog ]